Cases 81 - 90 of 201
Willie Smith v. Dawn Jones, et al
as 22-15522
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE T. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
DAWN JONES, KELLY LYON, DON ADAMS and others
Clervrain et al v. Ebert et al
as 3:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Emmanuel Benjoassaint, Kaity Borgella and others
Defendant:
Jhone Ebert, Charles Daniels, Ann Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hermanson v. Minev et al
as 3:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
James Eugene Hermanson
Defendant:
Michael Minev, John Keast and Naughton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Shelton v. Michael Minev, et al
as 22-15470
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID L. SHELTON
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL MINEV, ROSELLE DONNELLY, YUP and others
Fernandez Morales v. Aguilar et al
as 2:2022cv00451
Plaintiff:
Yoandy Fernandez Morales
Defendant:
Aguilar, Dr. Agustin, Omandac and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales v. Minev et al
as 2:2022cv00387
Plaintiff:
Sergio Morales
Defendant:
Michael Minev, W. Bernales, Sonya Carrillo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lawrence v. Minev et al
as 2:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Lawrence and Kevin James Siders
Defendant:
HDSP Medical Director, Michael Minev, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lazos v. Parks et al
as 3:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Felipe P. Lazos, Jr.
Defendant:
Erin parks, Michael Minev and LCC's Charge Nurse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Daniels et al
as 2:2022cv00293
Plaintiff:
Ammar Harris
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, Brian Williams, Sr., Michael Minev and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Dean v. Sisolak et al
as 3:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Sean Maurice Dean
Defendant:
Steve Sisolak, Aaron D. Ford, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
