Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,212
Azcarate v. Williams, et al.
as 24-3443
Petitioner: RAY ANTONIO AZCARATE
Respondent: BRIAN WILLIAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Leibel v. Reubart, et al.
as 24-3395
Petitioner: TATIANA LEIBEL
Respondent: REUBART, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Barren v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2024cv00976
Plaintiff: Donald Robin Barren
Defendant: James Dzurenda and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Farnum v. LeGrand, et al.
as 24-3316
Petitioner: JOHN MICHAEL FARNUM
Respondent: ROBERT LEGRAND, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Gonzales v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-3288
Petitioner: RAUL GONZALES
Respondent: WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Brumfield v. Williams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00652
Petitioner: Keith Deon Brumfield
Respondent: Brian Williams and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Azcarate v. Williams, et al.
as 24-3174
Petitioner: RAY ANTONIO AZCARATE
Respondent: BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Lomax v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00924
Petitioner: Nathan Louis Lomax
Respondent: Brian Williams, NDOC and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ross v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-3147
Petitioner: RONALD ROSS
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA and RONALD OLIVER
Eberhardt v. McMahill et al
as 2:2024cv00901
Petitioner: Randy Eberhardt
Respondent: Kevin McMahill and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?