Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Pierce et al v. Full Speed Ahead Inc et al
as 2:2015cv00862
Plaintiff: Tucker Pierce and Hannah Pierce
Defendant: Full Speed Ahead Inc and Tien Hsin Industries Co Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAMPAGNOLO S.R.L. v. FULL SPEED AHEAD, INC, et al
as 10-35876
Plaintiff - Appellee: CAMPAGNOLO S.R.L.
Defendant - Appellant: FULL SPEED AHEAD, INC, a Washington corporation
Defendant: TIEN HSIN INDUSTRIES CO., LTD.
CAMPAGNOLO S.R.L. v. FULL SPEED AHEAD, INC, et al
as 10-35639
Plaintiff - Appellant: CAMPAGNOLO S.R.L.
Defendant - Appellee: FULL SPEED AHEAD, INC, a Washington corporation and TIEN HSIN INDUSTRIES CO., LTD.
CAMPAGNOLO S.R.L. v. FULL SPEED AHEAD, INC, et al
as 10-35488
Plaintiff - Appellant: CAMPAGNOLO S.R.L.
Defendant - Appellee: FULL SPEED AHEAD, INC, a Washington corporation and TIEN HSIN INDUSTRIES CO., LTD.
CAMPAGNOLO S.R.L. v. FULL SPEED AHEAD, INC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv01372
Plaintiff: CAMPAGNOLO S.R.L. and CAMPAGNOLO S.R.L.
Defendant: FULL SPEED AHEAD, INC, FULL SPEED AHEAD, INC and FULL SPEED AHEAD, INC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
Tien Hsin Industries Co Ltd et al v. Cane Creek Cycling Components et al
as 2:2007cv01272
Plaintiff: Tien Hsin Industries Co Ltd and Full Speed Ahead Inc
Defendant: Cane Creek Cycling Components and Homer John Rader, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?