Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Woodhouse v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-3070
Plaintiff: BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, A resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands, Havensight Capital L.L.C., A U.S. Virgin Islands corporation
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR., DISTRICT JUDGE, Acting as a Government Official, a California citizen, R. GARY KLAUSNER, DISTRICT JUDGE and others
Benjamin Woodhouse v. United States Government, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-55636
Plaintiff / Appellant: BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, A Citizen of the United States, Resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, STANLEY BLUMENFELD, Jr., US District Court Judge, R. GARY KLAUSNER, United States District Court Judge and others
Benjamin Woodhouse, et al v. United States Government, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-55598
Plaintiff / Appellant: BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, A Citizen of the United States, Resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands and HAVENSIGHT CAPITAL L.L.C., a U.S. Virgin Islands corporation
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, STANLEY BLUMENFELD, Jr., US District Court Judge, GIBSON DUNN, INC., A California Corporation and others
Benjamin Woodhouse, et al v. United States Government, et al
as 22-55463
Plaintiff / Appellant: BENJAMIN WOODHOUSE, A Citizen of the United States, Resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands and HAVENSIGHT CAPITAL L.L.C., a U.S. Virgin Islands corporation
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, STANLEY BLUMENFELD, Jr., US District Court Judge, GIBSON DUNN, INC., A California Corporation and others
Schwartz et al v. Pfizer Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv01975
Plaintiff: Mark Schwartz and Joanne Schwartz
Defendant: Pfizer Inc, Pharmacia Corporation and G.D. Searle, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?