Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Gonzalez Perez, et al. v. Blanche
as 26-4470
Petitioner:
MARIA GUADALUPE GONZALEZ PEREZ, MARCOS LEDESMA GONZALEZ and FERNANDO LEDESMA GONZALEZ
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ledesma, et al. v. HiSmile, Inc., et al.
as 26-3516
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER LEDESMA, HELEN TANAKA, LARRY JONES and others
Defendant:
HISMILE, INC. and HISMILE PTY LTD.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03835
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Carolyn Demorst v. Lyft Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv04776
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Demorst
Defendant:
Lyft Inc., Ignacio Ledesma Luna, Martha Lopez Labrada and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Calbazana v. Pope et al
as 3:2026cv00241
Plaintiff:
Catherine Calbazana
Defendant:
Bradley Pope, Vandiver, W.C. Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laborin Ledesma v. Blanche
as 26-1896
Petitioner:
JUAN LABORIN LEDESMA
Respondent:
PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL and TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01974
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00772
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv10836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv10622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
