Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Prime Insurance Company v. Tourismo Express, Inc., et al.,
as 2:2024cv02492
Defendant:
Santiago Mendez Rodriguez, Andres Mendez Rodriguez, Jose Marchan Torres and others
Plaintiff:
Prime Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Prime Insurance Company v. TOURISMO EXPRESS INC. dba El Ticketon, a California corporation et al
as 1:2024at00717
Defendant:
ANDRES MENDEZ RODRIGUEZ, ALEJANDRO MORALES HERNANDEZ, ROBERTO MOTO ARCEO and others
Plaintiff:
Prime Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Ramirez Yanez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-4942
Petitioner:
PUEBLITO DANIELA RODRIGUEZ RAMIREZ, MARIA GUADALUPE RODRIGUEZ RAMIREZ, OLIVA RAMIREZ YANEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rodriguez v. Garland
as 21-201
Petitioner:
MARIA GUADALUPE RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Maria Rodriguez Mosqueda, et al v. William Barr
as 19-72728
Petitioner:
MARIA GUADALUPE RODRIGUEZ MOSQUEDA and ALEXA VIANNEY AGUILAR RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Maria Rodriguez Lara, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-71891
Petitioner:
MARIA GUADALUPE RODRIGUEZ LARA, MARIA YURITZI ALEJANDRE RODRIGUEZ, RAFAEL ALEJANDRE RODRIGUEZ and others
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Maria Rodriguez De Islas v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-73692
Petitioner:
MARIA GUADALUPE RODRIGUEZ DE ISLAS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Maria Rodriguez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-72815
Petitioner:
MARIA GUADALUPE RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Maria Rodriguez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-73373
Petitioner:
MARIA GUADALUPE RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Maria Rodriguez Alvarez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-71039
Petitioner:
MARIA GUADALUPE RODRIGUEZ ALVAREZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
