Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Orcino v. United Oil Gas Station et al
as 3:2012cv02861
Plaintiff:
Pete Orcino
Defendant:
United Oil Gas Station, National Link Incorporated, Metabank and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act
Collins v. Neiman Marcus, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02776
Plaintiff:
Ian Collins
Defendant:
Neiman Marcus, Inc., ATM Experts, LLC, ATM Experts USA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act
Klemetson v. Temecula Stage Stop et al
as 3:2012cv02636
Plaintiff:
Steve Klemetson
Defendant:
Temecula Stage Stop, Temecula Wine and Beer Garden, Ed Dool and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act
Kincaid v. Metabank et al
as 3:2012cv02286
Plaintiff:
Cecil Kincaid
Defendant:
Metabank, Meta Payment Systems, eGlobal and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act
Collins v. Mission Gorge Liquor et al
as 3:2011cv02345
Plaintiff:
Ian Collins
Defendant:
Mission Gorge Liquor, Metabank, Meta Payment Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Webb v. Metabank et al
as 3:2011cv02240
Plaintiff:
Spencer Webb
Defendant:
Metabank, Meta Payment Systems Swipe USA, LLC and DOES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Webb v. Metabank et al
as 3:2011cv02178
Plaintiff:
Spencer Webb
Defendant:
Metabank , Meta Payment Systems and DOES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Johnson v. Metabank et al
as 3:2011cv01561
Plaintiff:
Frank Johnson
Defendant:
Metabank, Meta Payment Systems and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
McInerney v. Metabank et al
as 3:2011cv01522
Plaintiff:
Brendan McInerney
Defendant:
Metabank, Meta Payment Systems and DOES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Rosenfeld v. Metabank et al
as 3:2011cv00779
Plaintiff:
Jordan Rosenfeld
Defendant:
Metabank, Meta Payment Systems and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
