Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Nicole, Inc. v. Pastel Design, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv10657
Plaintiff:
Nicole, Inc.
Defendant:
Song K Song, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive and Pastel Design, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Nicole, Inc. v. Ourz Fashion Inc et al.
as 2:2015cv02955
Defendant:
Does and Ourz Fashion Inc
Plaintiff:
Nicole, Inc.
Nicole, Inc. v. B.L.K. International, Inc., et al
as 2:2015cv01892
Defendant:
B.L.K. International, Inc, Does and Sanjay Khullar
Plaintiff:
Nicole, Inc.
Nicole, Inc. v. Skin Laundry Los Angeles, APC et al
as 2:2015cv00501
Plaintiff:
Nicole, Inc.
Defendant:
Skin Laundry Los Angeles, APC, Skin Laundry Holdings, LLC and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Nicole, Inc. v. Cielo USA Design Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv07551
Defendant:
Bag Town, Inc., C.I. Comercial Imperial Caribe S.A.S., Cielo USA Design Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nicole, Inc.
Samdae Enterprises, Inc v. Nicole, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv07281
Defendant:
Does, Samuel Lee and Nicole, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sam Dae Enterprises, Inc.
Nicole, Inc. v. Sam Dae Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv07157
Defendant:
Does and Sam Dae Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nicole, Inc.
Nicole, Inc. v. Meada Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv00966
Defendant:
Does, Zhixian Lu and Meada Corporation
Plaintiff:
Nicole, Inc.
Nicole, Inc. v. Vesun Trading, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv06044
Plaintiff:
Nicole, Inc. and Nicole, Inc.
Defendant:
Vesun Trading, Inc., Wan Xuan Shao and Does
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Guru Denim, Inc. v. Nicole, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv04419
Plaintiff:
Guru Denim, Inc. and Guru Denim, Inc.
Defendant:
Nicole, Inc., Nicole, Inc., Chai Bags and others
Cross Defendant:
ROES, Nicole, Inc. and Nicole, Inc.
Cross Claimant:
CALI! and CALI!
ThirdParty Defendant:
Joia Trading Co. and Roes
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
CALI! and CALI!
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Type:
Intellectual Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
