Cases 1 - 10 of 157
Hintze v. Daniels, et al.
as 24-6806
Defendant:
KIRK WIDMAR, Associate Warden of Operations, LCC, BARBARA CEGAVSKE, Secretary of State/Board of Prison Commissioner, Dr. IHAN AZZAM, Medical Officer, Dept. of Health and Human Services, Division of Public and Behavioral Health and others
Plaintiff:
JASON HINTZE
Hernandez v. Russell, et al.
as 24-3672
Plaintiff:
FRANK MANUEL HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
PERRY RUSSELL, Warden, RON SCHRECKENGOST, Assistant Warden WSCC, BRIANA HILL, Grievance Report/Assistant and others
Sullivan v. Sisolak, et al.
as 24-940
Plaintiff:
KEITH WILLIAM SULLIVAN
Defendant:
STEVEN SISOLAK, JOSEPH LOMBARDO, CHARLES DANIELS and others
Pattison v. Lombardo, et al.
as 24-478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE H PATTISON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE LOMBARDO, BRIAN SANDOVAL, STEVE SISOLAK and others
Skinner v. United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Reno
as 23-3289
Petitioner:
RODERICK SKINNER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, RENO
Not Classified By Court:
PERRY RUSSELL and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Hearring v. Snyder, et al.
as 23-1568
Appellant:
FRANK HEARRING
Appellee:
RICHARD SNYDER, PERRY RUSSELL, HAROLD WICKHAM and others
Thompson v. Russell et al
as 3:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
William L. Thompson
Defendant:
Perry Russell and Sandra Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyons v. Russell et al
as 3:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
William Lyons
Defendant:
Perry Russell and Sandra Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ric'e v. Russell et al
as 3:2023cv00339
Plaintiff:
Percey Lee Ric'e
Defendant:
Perry Russell and Sandra Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Russell et al
as 3:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Jones
Defendant:
Perry Russell and Sandra Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
