Cases 1 - 10 of 76
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16412
:
In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant:
SHANNON CASHION, W. CHRISTOPHER MCDONOUGH and KELLY KRESS
Defendant - Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16361
:
In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant:
DAVID C. MARLOW
Defendant - Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16364
:
In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant:
BARBARA COCHRAN, JAMES GLASE and BRYAN MARCUS
Defendant - Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16360
:
In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant:
NORMAN D. PALMER and ESTATE OF FERN COOK
Defendant - Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16342
:
In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant:
SEAN KENNETH HULL, RAYMOND FRANCIS CAMPBELL and SUPEROXYGEN, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
Nuvoton Technology Corporation et al v. Phillip M. Adams & Associates, LLC et al
as 5:2010cv05983
Plaintiff:
Nuvoton Technology Corporation , Nuvoton Technology Corporation America , Winbond Electronics Corporation and others
Defendant:
AFTG-TG, LLC , Phillip M. Adams & Associates, LLC and Phillip M. Adams
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Goodman v. Elpida Memoray Inc et al
as 5:2010cv03738
Plaintiff:
James B. Goodman
Defendant:
Elpida Memory Inc, Emerging Memory and Logic Solutions, Inc, Fidelis Co., Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Petro Computer Systems, Inc., et al v. Micron Technology, Inc., et al
as 08-16478
:
In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETRO COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., JOHNSON & JENNINGS, INC. and G.C.A. STRATEGIES, INC.
Defendant:
WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, INC., INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA CORP. and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN ANTITRUST INSTITUTE and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Tan v. Integrated Silicon Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv06166
Plaintiff:
Peng Tan and Peng Tan
Defendant:
Integrated Silicon Solutions, Inc. and Winbond Electronics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Nasimi v. Hitachi America, LTD et al
as 8:2007cv01254
Plaintiff:
Mahzad Nasimi
Defendant:
Hitachi America, LTD, Kitachi, LTD, Hitachi Electronic Devices USA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
