Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Belvin v. Ticket Solutions Inc
as 7:2012cv03887
Plaintiff:
John Ed Belvin
Defendant:
Ticket Solutions Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv03509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151 ta - Telecommunications Act of 1996
Lary v. The Doctors Answer, LLC et al
as 5:2012cv03510
Plaintiff:
John Lary
Defendant:
The Doctors Answer, LLC and Ben Pure
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System v. MetLife, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02626
Plaintiff:
City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System
Defendant:
MetLife, Inc. , C. Robert Henrikson , William J. Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cherry v. Thompson
as 5:2012cv02062
Plaintiff:
John Lee Cherry
Defendant:
Robin Renae Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Capuano v. ABN AMRO Mortgage Group Inc et al
as 4:2012cv00040
Plaintiff:
John E Capuano
Defendant:
ABN AMRO Mortgage Group Inc and Citimortgage Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dodson et al v. Acceptance Loan Company et al
as 5:2011cv03926
Plaintiff:
John R Dodson and Lola S Dodson
Defendant:
Acceptance Loan Company , Skiptrailer Towing Inc and Harbrook
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Stutts v. Encore Capital Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv03890
Plaintiff:
John Stutts
Defendant:
Encore Capital Group, Inc. , Midland Funding, LLC and Midland Credit Management, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lowe v. Rathman
as 1:2011cv02745
Plaintiff:
Jane Lowe
Defendant:
John T. Rathman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Bailey et al v. Barnes Givenski & Associates, LLC
as 2:2010cv03524
Plaintiff:
John E Bailey and Jessica N Bailey
Defendant:
Barnes Givenski & Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
