Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Canale et al v. Regions Bank, et al
as 2:2010cv00283
Plaintiff:
James J. Canale, James J. Canale, James J. Canale and others
Defendant:
Regions Bank, Regions Bank, Regions Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Petition for Removal: SEC Act
Canale et al v. Regions Bank et al
as 2:2010cv00285
Plaintiff:
James J. Canale, James J. Canale, James J. Canale and others
Defendant:
Regions Bank, Regions Bank, Regions Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Bourne et al v. ARK-LA-TEK Financial Services et al
as 2:2009cv01585
Plaintiff:
Andrew Bourne and Tamala Bourne
Defendant:
ARK-LA-TEK Financial Services, Benchmark Mortgage, Chris Beale and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Canale et al v. Regions Bank et al
as 2:2009cv01064
Plaintiff:
James J. Canale, James J. Canale, James J. Canale and others
Defendant:
Regions Bank, Regions Bank, Morgan Asset Management, Inc., and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Canale et al v. Regions Bank et al
as 2:2009cv01063
Plaintiff:
James J Canale, James J Canale, James J Canale and others
Defendant:
Regions Bank, Regions Bank, Regions Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Galapagos, L.L.C. et al v. Vision Bank et al
as 2:2009cv00978
Plaintiff:
Galapagos, L.L.C., Galapagos, L.L.C., Galapagos, L.L.C. and others
Defendant:
Vision Bank, Bama Bayou LLC, Joe Raley Builders, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
