Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jefferson County Alabama et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv00626
Defendant:
Actavis Inc., McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
Mike Hale, City of PleasantGrove Alabama, City of Hueytown Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lamar County, Alabama et al v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 7:2018cv00199
Defendant:
Actavis Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc, McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Hal Allred, Lamar County, Alabama and City of Vernon, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fayette County, Alabama et al v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 7:2018cv00200
Defendant:
Actavis Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc, McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Ingle, Fayette County, Alabama and City of Fayette, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schneider v. Actavis Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00333
Plaintiff:
Alan Schneider
Defendant:
Actavis Inc., Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc, Watson Pharma Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huthcins v. Actavis Group hf et al
as 2:2010cv00096
Plaintiff:
Katie Hutchins, Katie Hutchins and Katie Hutchins
Defendant:
Actavis Group hf, Actavis Totowa, LLC, Actavis, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wright et al v. Actavis Totowa, LLC et al
as 4:2009cv01671
Plaintiff:
Charles Wright, Charles Wright, Charles Wright and others
Defendant:
Actavis Totowa, LLC, Actavis Inc., Actavis US and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
High v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00889
Plaintiff:
Syble Dale High and Syble Dale High
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Melissa Jaffe, Actavis, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dyal et al v. Actavis Group hf et al
as 2:2008cv01271
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Dyal, Bobbie Dyal, Robert Dyal and others
Defendant:
Actavis Group hf, Actavis Group PTC, ehf, Actavis Totowa, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
