Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Local 250, United Association of Plumbers and Pipefitters, AFL-CIO v. Southern California Pipe Trades District Council No 16
as 2:2014cv06100
Plaintiff:
Local 250 United Association of Plumbers and Pipefitters AFL-CIO
Defendant:
Southern California Pipe Trades District Council No 16 of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry
Madelne Calabrese-Nassaney v. Dominion Enterprises et al
as 2:2013cv00258
Plaintiff:
Madeline Calabrese-Nassaney
Defendant:
Does and Dominion Enterprises
Aracely Galdamez v. Metro Services Group et al
as 2:2012cv10934
Defendant:
Does, Metro Services Group and Mauricio Sanchez
Plaintiff:
Aracely Galdamez
Mori Pam Rubin v. American Reclamation Inc
as 2:2012cv04674
Petitioner:
Mori Pam Rubin
Respondent:
American Reclamation Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Juan Morales v. Able Building Maintenance Co et al
as 2:2011cv10472
Defendant:
Able Building Maintenance Co and Does
Plaintiff:
Juan Morales
Carpenters Local Union No 1506 v. PCN3 Inc
as 2:2011cv10250
Petitioner:
Carpenters Local Union No 1506
Respondent:
PCN3 Inc
Douglas Dejohn et al v. AT&T Corp. et al
as 2:2010cv07107
Defendant:
AT&T Corp., AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Dejohn, Alex Franey, ROES and others
Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters v. Senel Construction Engineering et al
as 2:2010cv03013
Defendant:
DOES
Respondent:
Senel Construction Engineering
Petitioner:
Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters
William Culfin v. IBEW Local 11 et al
as 2:2010cv02748
Defendant:
Does 1 through 20, inclusive and IBEW Local 11
Plaintiff:
William Culfin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Osmond v. Screen Actors Guild et al
as 2:2007cv07095
Plaintiff:
Ken Osmond, Ken Osmond and Ken Osmond
Defendant:
Screen Actors Guild, Screen Actors Guild and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
