Cases 31 - 40 of 215
Jonathan Startz v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
as 2:2016cv09627
Defendant:
Does, JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. and Quality Loan Service Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Startz
Danilo Real et al v. James Dimon et al
as 8:2016cv02270
Plaintiff:
Laurel Bauer and Danilo Isaac Real
Defendant:
James Dimon, Clement Durkin, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Niki Alexander Shetty v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 2:2016cv08986
Defendant:
All Persons Unknown Claiming, Does and JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Plaintiff:
Niki Alexander Shetty
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association v. Marie S. Debello et al
as 5:2016cv02427
Defendant:
Marie S. Debello and Does
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
Isaac Gorden Powell v. Quality Loan Services et al
as 2:2016cv07811
Defendant:
Quality Loan Services, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Washington Mutual Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Powell and Isaac Gorden Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Harry M. Fox et al v. JPMorgan Chase, N.A., et al
as 2:2016cv07552
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA, California Reconveyance Company, Doe Defendants and others
Plaintiff:
Harry M. Fox
Sam Saber v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association et al
as 8:2016cv01786
Defendant:
Does, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association and Quality Loan Service Corporation
Plaintiff:
Sam Saber
Victor Page v. JPMorgan Chase Bank et al
as 5:2016cv02024
Defendant:
All Persons Claiming, Does, JPMorgan Chase Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Page
Paulino F. Segura v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., et al
as 8:2016cv01571
Defendant:
DOES, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Paulino F. Segura
Kwang Tae Kim v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 2:2016cv06028
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon, Inc., Does, HSBC Bank USA, N. A. and others
Plaintiff:
Kwang Tae Kim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
