Cases 71 - 80 of 3,767
Brian Hong v. StubHub, Inc.
as 2:2024cv03318
Plaintiff:
Brian Hong
Defendant:
StubHub, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Alan Montenegro et al v. Johnson and Johnson Consumer, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01895
Plaintiff:
Alan Montenegro and Melissa Medina
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc., Johnson and Johnson Consumer, Inc. and Does 1 to 50, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ines Kuperschmit v. L.J. Zhu et al
as 2:2024cv01367
Plaintiff:
Ines Kuperschmit
Defendant:
L.J. Zhu and THE JUDGMENT INSTITUTE OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
v. GRECO et al
as 2:2024cv03244
Defendant:
BMW NA, BMW FS, MBZ USA MERCEDES BENZ USA and others
Claimant:
VINCENZO GRECO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Cohen v. Copart, Inc.
as 2:2024cv03268
Plaintiff:
Arik Cohen
Defendant:
Copart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Shirley Castillo et al v. Atekcity Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv02643
Petitioner:
Shirley Castillo and Kaden Geiger
Respondent:
Atekcity Corporation and Vesync Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Sean Miran v. Hard Eight Nutrition LLC
as 5:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Sean Miran
Defendant:
Hard Eight Nutrition LLC d/b/a BulkSupplements.com
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Gwendolyn Hall v. Rob Bonta
as 2:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Hall
Defendant:
Attorney General Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Claudia Culberson v. Keenan and Associates
as 2:2024cv01437
Plaintiff:
Claudia Culberson
Defendant:
Keenan & Associates and Keenan and Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Kelly Barton Terry v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Kelly Barton Terry
Defendant:
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
