Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Love Tuner Inc. v. Daniel Grenzner et al
as 2:2022cv03710
Plaintiff:
Love Tuner Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel Grenzner, HeavenSeven GmbH, Heavenseven Swiss AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
HeavenSeven GmbH v. Lovetuner, Inc.
as 2:2022cv03464
Petitioner:
HeavenSeven GmbH, an Austrian limited liability company and HeavenSeven GmbH
Respondent:
Lovetuner, Inc., a California corporation and Lovetuner, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Daniel Grenzner and Heavenseven Swiss AG
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
Halma Investment Holdings Limited et al v. Juan Antonio Bonel Borssen et al
as 2:2020cv06953
Defendant:
DANIEL S. DURRIE, EDWARD PETERSON, UNITED NODOTS LTD. and others
Petitioner:
JAY PEPOSE
Plaintiff:
Halma Investment Holdings Limited
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
Brett Andrew v. Daniel Austin Walzl
as 2:2020cv03423
Petitioner:
Brett Andrew
Respondent:
Daniel Austin Walzl
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
Matter of the Arbitration of Certain Controversies between Brett-Andrew: House of Nelson
as 2:2020cv01092
Petitioner:
Brett Nelson
In Re:
Matter of the Arbitration of Certain Controversies
Respondent:
Daniel Austin Walzl
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
Shawn Talbot Rice et al v. United States et al
as 5:2020cv00079
Respondent:
United States, William Barr, United States of America and others
Petitioner:
Shawn Talbot Rice
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
Daniel R. Allemeier Jr. v. Zyppah, Inc.
as 2:2018cv07437
Respondent:
Zyppah, Inc.
Petitioner:
Daniel R. Allemeier Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185
Simon Painter et al v. Brett Daniels et al
as 2:2015cv08913
Plaintiff:
Asia Live Network, PTE, LTD, Timothy Lawson, Simon Painter and others
Defendant:
Brett Daniels Productions, Inc. and Brett Daniels
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
