Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robert Briseno v. Conagra Foods, Inc.
as 2:2011cv05379
Plaintiff:
Michele Andrade, Patty Boyer, Robert Briseno and others
Defendant:
Conagra Foods, Inc.
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Adam J. Levitt of DiCello Levitt Gutzler LLC
Interested Party:
Shiyang Huang
Not Classified By Court:
M. Todd Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Duane "Dog" Chapman et al v. Maureen Kedes Krutonog et al
as 2:2010cv02372
Plaintiff:
Beth Chapman and Duane "Dog" Chapman
Defendant:
Doe Corporations 1-20, Doe Defendants 1-20, Doe Partnerships 1-20 and others
Patricia L. Bruce et al v. H. Frederick Christie et al
as 2:2010cv01923
Defendant:
Kimberly Alexy, H. Frederick Christie, Bruce Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia L. Bruce and Kenneth Donahue
Christopher J Arndt et al v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 8:2009cv00862
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Arndt, Christopher J Arndt, Christopher J Arndt and others
Defendant:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company, USAA Casualty Insurance Company, United Services Automobile Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Insurance Contract
Type:
Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv04110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080 Student Loan Recovery
Provident Savings Bank FSB v. Maureen Ann Hughes et al
as 5:2007cv00432
Plaintiff:
Provident Savings Bank FSB and Provident Savings Bank FSB
Defendant:
Maureen Ann Hughes and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Provident Savings Bank FSB v. Maureen Ann Hughes et al
as 5:2007cv00357
Plaintiff:
Provident Savings Bank FSB and Provident Savings Bank FSB
Defendant:
Maureen Ann Hughes, Maureen Ann Hughes and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
