Cases 71 - 80 of 95
Enagic USA, Inc. et al v. Anthony Tseng et al
as 2:2010cv02079
Counter Claimant:
A2O Water, Inc. and Anthony Tseng
Cross Claimant:
A2O Water, Inc. and Anthony Tseng
Defendant:
A2O Water, Inc. and Anthony Tseng
Counter Defendant:
Enagic Co. Ltd. and Enagic USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Enagic Co. Ltd. and Enagic USA, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Hironari Oshiro, Roes and Sanastec Inc
Barry Rosen v. The ServInt Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv01940
Defendant:
Does and The ServInt Corporation
Counter Defendant:
Roes 1-10 and Barry Rosen
Plaintiff:
Barry Rosen
Counter Claimant:
The ServInt Corporation
David N Frear Jr et al v. Online Alley LLC et al
as 8:2010cv00282
Counter Defendant:
DNF3 LLC, David N Frear Jr and ROES 1 through 10 inclusive
Plaintiff:
DNF3 LLC and David N Frear Jr
Defendant:
DOES, Dennis Nafisi, Online Alley LLC and others
Counter Claimant:
Dennis Nafisi and Online Alley LLC
Burton Bell et al v. Raymond Herrera et al
as 2:2010cv00848
Cross Defendant:
4G Producciones, Alter Ego, Burton Bell and others
Defendant:
Archetype Music Inc, Does, Fear Factory Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Burton Bell, Dean Cazares and Oxidizer Inc
Cross Claimant:
Raymond Herrera and Christian Olde Wolbers
Counter Defendant:
Plog Music
Jason Trosper, et al v. Metal Mulisha, LLC
as 2:2010cv00825
Counter Defendant:
Cowboy Militia, LLC, ROES and Jason Trosper
Plaintiff:
Cowboy Militia, LLC and Jason Trosper
Counter Claimant:
Metal Mulisha, LLC
Defendant:
Metal Mulisha, LLC
Unknown:
Baxter W Banowsky
Buckley H. Crispin v. Christian Audigier, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv09509
Plaintiff:
Buckley H. Crispin
Petitioner:
JR 93 Inc
Defendant:
Christian Audigier, Inc., Nervous Tattoo, Inc., Shop On Stage, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
New Life Company, LLC
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Hon. Patricia L Collins
Cross Defendant:
Audigier Brand Management Group, LLC and ROES
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Guru Denim, Inc. v. Nicole, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv04419
Plaintiff:
Guru Denim, Inc. and Guru Denim, Inc.
Defendant:
Nicole, Inc., Nicole, Inc., Chai Bags and others
Cross Defendant:
ROES, Nicole, Inc. and Nicole, Inc.
Cross Claimant:
CALI! and CALI!
ThirdParty Defendant:
Joia Trading Co. and Roes
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
CALI! and CALI!
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Type:
Intellectual Property
Mantra Films, Inc. et al v. Oasys Mobile, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv04420
Plaintiff:
Mantra Films, Inc., Mantra Films, Inc., Mantra Films, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Oasys Mobile, Inc., Oasys Mobile, Inc., Mandalay Media, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
Roes 1-10 and GGW Marketing, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Oasys Mobile, Inc. and Oasys Mobile, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Type:
Intellectual Property
Ming Lin v. Sing Tao Newspapers Los Angeles Ltd. et al
as 2:2009cv03904
Plaintiff:
Ming Lin
Defendant:
Sing Tao Newspapers Los Angeles Ltd., Sing Tao Newspapers Los Angeles Ltd., New Bridge Media, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
ROES and Ming Lin
Counter Claimant:
New Bridge Media, Inc., New Bridge Media, Inc., Jin Xiu He and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
Esther Li, Guo Hua Ning, Roes 6-10 and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
New Bridge Media, Inc., New Bridge Media, Inc., Jin Xiu He and others
Cross Defendant:
MOES, New Bridge Media, Inc. and Jin Xiu He
Cross Claimant:
Sing Tao Newspapers Los Angeles Ltd. and Sing Tao Newspapers Los Angeles Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
LA Printex Industries, Inc. v. Belk, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv03286
Plaintiff:
LA Printex Industries, Inc. and LA Printex Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Belk, Inc., Belk, Inc., Around the World Apparel, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
ROES and LA Printex Industries, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Around the World Apparel, Inc., Around the World Apparel, Inc. and Around the World Apparel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
