Cases 71 - 80 of 132
Signal IP, Inc. v. Toyota North America, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05162
Plaintiff:
Signal IP, Inc.
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and Toyota North America, Inc.
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. et al v. Steven Madden Ltd et al
as 2:2015cv05123
Defendant:
Does and Steven Madden Ltd, a Delaware Corporation
Plaintiff:
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. and Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II
Spigen Korea Co., Ltd. et al v. ISPEAK CO., LTD.
as 8:2015cv01049
Defendant:
ISPEAK CO., LTD. and VERUS U.S.A., LLC
Plaintiff:
Spigen Korea Co., Ltd.
Canon U.S.A., Inc. v. Thuy Le et al
as 8:2015cv00938
Plaintiff:
Canon U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant:
Does, Thuy Le, Thanh P. Nguyen and others
Nuance Industries Inc v. Ashley Stewart Inc et al
as 2:2015cv03783
Defendant:
Ashley Stewart Inc, Does, Fabtrends U.S.A. Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Nuance Industries Inc
Star Fabrics Inc v. UMGEE U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01845
Defendant:
C Luce Inc, Cuby Rock Inc, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Star Fabrics Inc
Toyo Tire & Rubber Co., Ltd. v. CIA Wheel Group, et al
as 8:2015cv00246
Plaintiff:
Toyo Tire & Rubber Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
CIA Wheel Group, Hong Kong Tri Ace Tire Co Ltd, Qingdao Doublestar Tire Industrial Co, Ltd and others
Counter Claimant:
Doublestar Group Corp
Counter Defendant:
Toyo Tire & Rubber Co., Ltd, Toyo Tire U.S.A. Corp. and Does 1-10
Cross Defendant:
Jinlin Ma
Special Master:
Hon. James P Gray
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Toyo Tire & Rubber Co., Ltd et al
as 8:2015cv00245
Movant:
TOYO TIRE U.S.A. CORP. and Toyo Tire & Rubber Co., Ltd
Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Skechers U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08988
Plaintiff:
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
Defendant:
Does and Skechers U.S.A., Inc.
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha et al v 4298322 Canada Inc.
as 2:2014cv08532
Defendant:
4298322 Canada Inc.
Plaintiff:
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha and Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
