Cases 91 - 100 of 17,871
Manuel Navar Diaz v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03412
Plaintiff:
Manuel Navar Diaz
Defendant:
Martin J. OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Curtis Eugene Jung v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00886
Plaintiff:
Curtis Eugene Jung
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Paul Conklin v. Martin J. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03437
Plaintiff:
Paul Conklin
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Julie Somerville v. Martin J. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03378
Plaintiff:
Julie Somerville
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Whitney Renee Ruffin v. Martin J. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03376
Plaintiff:
Whitney Renee Ruffin
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Kelly Mathew Padden v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv03377
Plaintiff:
Kelly Mathew Padden
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Oreginal M. Carr v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv03365
Plaintiff:
Oreginal M. Carr
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Mike Bowman v. Martin J. O Malley
as 5:2024cv00858
Plaintiff:
Mike Bowman
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Claudia Marian Sharp v. Martin O Malley
as 5:2024cv00862
Plaintiff:
Claudia Marian Sharp
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Alfonso Lepe v. Martin J. OMalley
as 5:2024cv00840
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Lepe
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
