Cases 51 - 60 of 17,831
Amanda M. Stoican v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00922
Plaintiff:
Amanda M. Stoican
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Nikhil Chander Narang v. Martin O'Malley
as 8:2024cv00928
Plaintiff:
Nikhil Chander Narang
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Coleene P. C. v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03458
Plaintiff:
Coleen P. C.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Paul Conklin v. Martin J. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03437
Plaintiff:
Paul Conklin
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Denise Carroll v. Martin OMalley
as 2:2024cv03410
Plaintiff:
Denise Carroll
Defendant:
Martin OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Manuel Navar Diaz v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03412
Plaintiff:
Manuel Navar Diaz
Defendant:
Martin J. OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Curtis Eugene Jung v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00886
Plaintiff:
Curtis Eugene Jung
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Tiffany Renee Williams Castillo v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01725
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Renee Williams Castillo
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kelly Mathew Padden v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv03377
Plaintiff:
Kelly Mathew Padden
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Julie Somerville v. Martin J. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03378
Plaintiff:
Julie Somerville
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
