Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Michael Walker v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2008cv04707
Defendant:
Chief William Bratton, City of Los Angeles, DOES and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shamah Moody v. Michael J. Astrue
as 5:2008cv01607
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Shamah Moody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jimmy Nathan Moody v. Debra Dexter et al
as 2:2008cv04530
Respondent:
California Dept. of Corrections and Debra Dexter
Petitioner:
Jimmy Nathan Moody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moody W. Tanksley v. Atascadero State Hospital et al
as 2:2009cv06415
Plaintiff:
Moody W. Tanksley
Defendant:
Atascadero State Hospital, Wichman, Assan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Misty Moody v. Michael J Astrue
as 5:2009cv01636
Plaintiff:
Misty Moody
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue, Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Type:
Other Statutes
Moody Woodrow Tanksley v. Atascadero State Hospital Staff et al
as 2:2009cv06108
Plaintiff:
Moody Woodrow Tanksley
Defendant:
Atascadero State Hospital Staff, Richman, Janet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moody W. Tanksley v. Atascadero State Hospital et al
as 2:2009cv05886
Plaintiff:
Moody W. Tanksley
Defendant:
Atascadero State Hospital, Castrelow, Mary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.