Cases 31 - 40 of 146
County of Riverside et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 5:2018cv01372
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
County of Riverside and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Markice Leonard v. People for the State of California
as 2:2018cv05066
Petitioner:
Markice Leonard
Respondent:
W. L. Montgomery and People for the State of California
David Travers v. People of The State of California et al
as 8:2017cv01518
Respondent:
People of The State of California and S. Sherman
Petitioner:
David Travers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dean Himbler Aviles v. Social Security Administration et al
as 2:2018cv04115
Plaintiff:
Dean Himbler Aviles
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles Municipal Corporation, District Attorneys Office, Jackie Lacey and others
Ulysses Franklin Moore Jr. v. People of the State of California
as 5:2018cv00907
Petitioner:
Ulysses Franklin Moore, Jr.
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Christopher Robert Lute v. People of the State of California et al
as 5:2018cv00721
Respondent:
County of Riverside, California, People of the State of California and Riverside County Sheriff Department
Petitioner:
Christopher Robert Lute
Joseph Wayne Foster Jr v. The People Of The State Of California
as 2:2018cv02783
Petitioner:
Joseph Wayne Foster, Jr
Respondent:
The People Of The State Of California
Harry Donaldson, Jr. v. John Sutton et al
as 5:2018cv00607
Petitioner:
Harry Donaldson, Jr.
Respondent:
John Sutton and The People Of The State Of California
Scott Andrew Morrison v. Los Angeles Sheriffs et al
as 2:2018cv02290
Respondent:
Jay H. Ford, III, Los Angeles Sheriffs, Jim McConnell and others
Petitioner:
Scott Andrew Morrison
Zuri S.K. Young v. People of The State of California
as 2:2018cv02208
Respondent:
People of The State of California
Petitioner:
Zuri S K Young
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
