Cases 31 - 40 of 80
Kenneth Frye v. Nantkwest, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06700
Defendant:
Michael D. Blaszyk, Cambridge Equities LP, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Frye
Craig Wiencek v. Nantkwest, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06705
Defendant:
Michael D. Blaszyk, Cambridge Equities LP, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Wiencek
Michael Hare et al v. Nantkwest, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06697
Defendant:
Michael D. Blaszyk, Cambridge Equities LP, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Hare and Norman Jacobs
Seavon Pierce et al v. United States Congress et al
as 2:2016cv06332
Defendant:
Attorney General Kamala Harris, Federal Bureau of Investigations, Federal Judcial Commission State Capitol and others
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06246
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Maurice Pierce v. Prog Leasing, LLC
as 2:2016cv06202
Plaintiff:
Maurice Pierce
Defendant:
Prog Leasing, LLC
Saevon Pierce v. John E. McDermott et al
as 2:2016cv05393
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations, Federal Judicial Commission, Julie L. Garland and others
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith Incorporated v. Carrie Riley
as 2:2016cv04973
Defendant:
Carrie Riley
Plaintiff:
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith Incorporated and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 0009
Seavon Pierce v. John E. McDermott et al
as 2:2016cv04756
Defendant:
Civil Rights and Criminal Enforcement Sec., Anthony Da'Silva, Federal Bureau of Investigations and others
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Jacksonville Police and Fire Pension Fund v. Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. et al
as 2:2015cv06210
Defendant:
Gregory L. Armstrong, Barclays Capital Inc., Victor Burk and others
Plaintiff:
Jacksonville Police and Fire Pension Fund
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
