Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Elaine Anderson et al v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv07535
Plaintiff:
Connie Ackel, John Ackel, Elaine Anderson and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc., Caldera Medical, Inc. and others
John Lowe v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv07506
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Does, Johnson and Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
John Lowe
Margo Karn et al v. Caldera Medical, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv07515
Defendant:
American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., American Medical Systems, Inc., Caldera Medical, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Margo Karn and Melvin W. Karn
Unknown:
Piper Lynn Morrison and Piper Lynn Morrison
Darryl Swartz v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv07505
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Does, Johnson and Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl Swartz
Michael Ferris v. DePuy Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv02064
Defendant:
DePuy Ace Medical Company, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Ferris
Rony Elkies et al v. Johnson and Johnson Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv07320
Plaintiff:
Danielle Alfandry and Rony Elkies
Defendant:
Does, Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc. and Johnson and Johnson Services, Inc
Timothy Martella v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv07214
Defendant:
Johnson and Johnson, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Does and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Martella
Michael Kaufman v. DePuy Synthes, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv07191
Defendant:
DePuy Synthes Products, Inc., DePuy Synthes, Inc., Does and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Kaufman
Nancy J. Edwards v. Johnson and Johnson et al
as 2:2017cv07120
Plaintiff:
Nancy J Edwards
Defendant:
Johnson and Johnson and Johnson and Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.
Patricia Ann Hilderbrand et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv06975
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Does, Ethicon LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Clinton Ronald Hilderbrand and Patricia Ann Hilderbrand
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
