Cases 61 - 70 of 146
Dean Himbler Aviles et al v. California Highway Patrol et al
as 5:2017cv02161
Plaintiff:
Dean Himbler Aviles and Himbler Investments Organization
Defendant:
California Highway Patrol, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department and The People of the State of California
Kevin Eleby v. People of the State of California
as 2:2017cv07610
Petitioner:
Kevin Eleby
Respondent:
People of the State of California
In Re Christopher P. Epsha
as 2:2017cv07438
Appellant:
Christopher P. Epsha
In Re Debtor:
Christopher P. Epsha
Appellee:
The People of the State of California
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv01685
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DeShawn L. Davis v. The People of the State of California
as 2:2017cv03903
Petitioner:
DeShawn Lydell Davis
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leonard Louie Ochoa v. People of the State of California
as 2:2017cv06257
Plaintiff:
Leonard Louie Ochoa
Defendant:
People of the State of California
Saul Campos v. People of the State of California
as 2:2017cv06089
Petitioner:
Saul Campos
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Demetrius L. Bell v. The People of the State of California
as 5:2017cv01586
Petitioner:
Demetrius L. Bell
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
People of The State of California v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv00923
Defendant:
Barr Laboratories, Inc., Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc, Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH and others
Plaintiff:
People of The State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Larry Lee Jacks v. People of the State of California et al
as 2:2017cv05363
Defendant:
Judge Robert Christinsan, Timothy Haskell, People of the State of California and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Jacks
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
