Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Earl Simpson v. Department of State Hospitals et al
as 5:2018cv00616
Defendant:
Pam Ahlin, Department of State Hospitals and Patton State Hospital Corporation
Plaintiff:
Earl Simpson
Lloyd Brooks Jr. v. L.A. Twin Towers Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2017cv03509
Petitioner:
Lloyd Brooks, Jr.
Respondent:
L.A. Twin Towers Correctional Facility and Patton State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ronnie Paul Huff v. Superintendent of Patton State Hospital
as 5:2017cv02180
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Paul Huff
Defendant:
Superintendent of Patton State Hospital
Lisa Belyew v. Patton State Hospital
as 2:2017cv06129
Plaintiff:
Lisa Belyew
Defendant:
Patton State Hospital
Jack Robert Smith v. Patton State Hospital
as 5:2017cv01594
Defendant:
Harry Oreol and Patton State Hospital
Plaintiff:
Jack Robert Smith
Eric Bloss v. Patton State Hospital et al
as 2:2017cv05362
Plaintiff:
Eric Bloss
Defendant:
Racquel Hanson and Patton State Hospital
Brian Jeffrey Brown v. J.C. Penny Company Inc et al
as 5:2013cv02172
Plaintiff:
BRIAN-JEFFREY BROWN
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Company Inc, Patton State Hospital, Riverside County Sheriff's Department and others
James Anthony Montgomery v. Patton State Hospital et al
as 2:2009cv06233
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Montgomery
Defendant:
Patton State Hospital, Lem, Ogbechie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Anthony Bomar v. Patton State Hospital
as 2:2009cv05580
Petitioner:
Anthony Bomar
Respondent:
Patton State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Other Statutes
Tom Smith v. The Justice Department et al
as 2:2008cv01770
Plaintiff:
Tom Smith
Defendant:
The Justice Department, Bill Lockyer, CDC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
