Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Brian Martins v. Northwest Development Company et al
as 5:2023cv00805
Petitioner:
Brian Martins and New West Investment Group, Inc.
Respondent:
Northwest Development Company a California corporation also doing business as New West Investment Group, Inc., California corporation, Gregory M. Brown, Sr., Gregory Brown, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Emma Jean Anderson v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al
as 2:2022cv02160
Petitioner:
Emma Jean Anderson, Terry Abbott, John Robert Allman and others
Respondent:
Islamic Republic of Iran and National Iranian Oil Corporation
Interested Party:
Oaktree Capital Management, LP and Oaktree Capital Management LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Coltrane Larshan Pearson v. Dave Baughman
as 2:2018cv05065
Respondent:
Dave Baughman
Petitioner:
Coltrane Larshan Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shannon Pearson v. Tucalota Park, LLC
as 5:2018cv01129
Defendant:
DOES and Tucalota Park, LLC
Plaintiff:
Shannon Pearson
Scottsdale Indemnity Company v. Maury Burns et al
as 2:2018cv00196
Defendant:
4PM, LLC, Maury Burns, William J Heffernan and others
Plaintiff:
Scottsdale Indemnity Company
Maureen Kelly Pearson et al v. Maury Burns et al
as 2:2018cv00030
Defendant:
4 PM, LLC, Does, William J Heffernan and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jeremy Pearson and Maureen Kelly Pearson
Dermot Givens v. Wasserman Comden Casselman and Pearson
as 2:2017cv08080
Plaintiff:
Dermot Givens
Defendant:
Wasserman Comden Casselman and Pearson LLP
Angela Pearson v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv07456
Defendant:
Does and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Angela Pearson
Angela Pearson v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2017cv07412
Defendant:
DOES and United States of America United Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Angela Pearson
Kevin Darnell Pearson v. Ronald Davis
as 2:2017cv06668
Respondent:
Ronald Davis
Petitioner:
Kevin Darnell Pearson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
