Cases 161 - 170 of 371
Ramiro Contreras v. JPMorgan Chase National Association et al
as 5:2014cv01145
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Contreras
Defendant:
Does, Federal National Mortgage Association, JPMorgan Chase Bank National Association and others
Agajanian v. U.S. Bank, N.A., as Trustee for WAMU Mortgage Pass Through Certificate for WMALT Series 2007-OA2 et al
as 2:2014cv03974
Plaintiff:
Jacklin Agajanian
Defendant:
Does, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and U.S. Bank, N.A.
Jack Tanner v. WAMU, Chase Bank Inc et al
as 5:2014cv01031
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, GB Inland Properties LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Tanner
Roberto Ruggeri v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association et al
as 2:2014cv03735
Defendant:
Banc of America Funding 2007-8 Trust, Does and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
Plaintiff:
Roberto Ruggeri
Gary Chan et al v. JP Morgan Chase, NA et al
as 2:2014cv03365
Plaintiff:
Gary Chan and Gina Chan
Defendant:
DOES, JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Richard Markowicz et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2014cv03197
Defendant:
Does and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Jolanta Markowicz and Richard Markowicz
Jeff Davamandi v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2014cv03143
Plaintiff:
Jeff Davamandi
Defendant:
Does and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Johnson et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Successor-in-Interest to Washington Mutual Bank, N.A.
as 5:2014cv00785
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Successor-in-Interest to Washington Mutual Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Paula A. Johnson and Stephen H. Johnson
Stephen H. Johnson et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N A
as 5:2014cv00777
Defendant:
Does and JPMorgan Chase Bank N A
Unknown:
David D Piper
Plaintiff:
Paula A Johnson and Stephen H. Johnson
Noemi Penaloza v. Select Portfolio Servicing Inc et al
as 2:2014cv02571
Defendant:
Does, JPMorgan Chase Bank NA and Select Portfolio Servicing Inc
Plaintiff:
Noemi Penaloza
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
