Cases 171 - 180 of 371
Fab Films, LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 2:2014cv01687
Defendant:
California Reconveyance Company, Does and JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Plaintiff:
Fab Films, LLC
Stacey Bogan et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2014cv01484
Plaintiff:
Stacey Bogan, Francis Cass, James Hadfield and others
Defendant:
Does, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Xavier Roy v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2014cv01445
Defendant:
Does, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Xavier Roy
Denise Alex, et al v. JPMorgan Chase & Co., et al
as 2:2014cv01402
Plaintiff:
Denise Alex, Mirthala Alvarado, Ivan Amnay and others
Defendant:
Does, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
Berdj Bouldoukian v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 2:2014cv01313
Plaintiff:
Berdi Bouldoukian
Defendant:
Does and JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA v. Oscar Atienza et al
as 5:2014cv00281
Defendant:
All Others Known and Unknown Claiming to Have an Interest in Real Property Commonly Known as 29675 Glen Brook Way, Murrieta, California 92563, Oscar Atienza, David Alan Boucher and others
Counter Claimant:
Oscar Atienza
Counter Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Unknown:
Marvin Belo Adviento and Marvin Belo Adviento
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
John Alfred Ritter v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 2:2014cv00375
Defendant:
Does, JPMorgan Chase Bank NA and Northwest Trustee Services Inc
Plaintiff:
John Alfred Ritter
Angela Lent v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 8:2014cv00063
Defendant:
DOES and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Angela Lent
Gerald Myles v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2013cv09036
Defendant:
Does and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Gerald Myles
Linda Kay Bryant v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2013cv08493
Plaintiff:
Linda Kay Bryant
Defendant:
Does, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and National Default Servicing Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
