Cases 11 - 20 of 57
James A Badame et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 2:2013cv04673
Plaintiff:
Diane M Badame and James A Badame
Defendant:
Does and JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Allen Riedel et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 5:2013cv01146
Defendant:
Does, EMC Mortgage LLC and JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Plaintiff:
Allen Riedel and Anna Riedel
Anthony Teresi v. Tom Bohl et al
as 2:2013cv03950
Defendant:
Tom Bohl, Judge Philip S Gutierrez, JP Morgan Chase Bank NA and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Teresi
Shu Di Chen v. California Reconveyance Company et al
as 2:2013cv03197
Defendant:
All Persons Unknown, California Reconveyance Company, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Shu Di Chen
Cathy J Norris et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 5:2013cv00705
Defendant:
Does and JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Plaintiff:
Cathy J Norris and Michael F Norris
Jack Evan Toyer v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 2:2013cv02632
Defendant:
Does, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, JP Morgan Chase Bank NA and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Evan Toyer
Gabrielle Harris et al v. US Bank National Association et al
as 2:2013cv02561
Defendant:
Does, JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Gabrielle Harris and Gabrielle Harris
Bryan Edward Kaye v. Park Orleans Homeowner's Association et al
as 8:2013cv00578
Defendant:
All Persons Unknown Claiming Any Title, Estate, Lien or Interest in the Property Described in the Complaint Adverse to Plaintiff's Title, or Any Cloud on Plaintiff's Title Thereto, American Home Mortgage, DOES and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Edward Kaye
Linda Lee Startup v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 8:2013cv00541
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Plaintiff:
Linda Lee Startup
Mohammad Ali Gomrokchi v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 5:2013cv00566
Defendant:
Does, JP Morgan Chase Bank NA and THR California LP
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Ali Gomrokchi
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
