Cases 51 - 60 of 266
Virgina Ross v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv02472
Defendant:
DOES, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson and Johnson Services, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Virginia Ross
Dale Fair v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08816
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dale Fair
David P. Flugum v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08640
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Does, Johnson and Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
David P. Flugum
Ronald Kucera v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08405
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy Synthes, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Kucera
Tanna Schoelzel et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08066
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy Synthes, Inc., Does and others
Plaintiff:
David Lucas and Tanna Schoelzel
"TPS Corp.":
Thomas P. Schmalzried, M.D. A Professional Corporation
James McNelis et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08062
Defendant:
DOES, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy Synthes, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
James McNelis and Joleta McNelis
Rosemary Hahn v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv07909
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy Synthes Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Hahn
James P. Imhof v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv07872
Defendant:
DOES, DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
James P Imhof
Robert E. Gervais et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06293
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy Synthes, Inc., Does and others
Plaintiff:
Donna M Gervais and Robert E Gervais
Michael Perez v. DePuy Orthopadeics Inc et al
as 2:2016cv06283
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopadeics Inc, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Perez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
