Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Yong K Hyung et al v. John Chungshin Kim et al
as 2:2011cv02825
Defendant:
American National Insurance Company, Does, John Chungshin Kim and others
Plaintiff:
California US Clothing Inc and Yong K Hyung
Ramon Mosqueda v. PMC Bancorp et al
as 2:2011cv02524
Defendant:
Cal-Western Reconveyance, CitiMortgage, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Mosqueda
Khem Lam et al v. PMC Bancorp et al
as 5:2011cv00165
Defendant:
Aurora Loan Svcs, PMC Bancorp and Qualilty Loan Svc Corp
Plaintiff:
Charrise Espiritu and Khem Lam
Chelsea Tae-Ryoung Park v. PMC Bancorp et al
as 2:2010cv07695
Defendant:
Chicago Title Company, Does, Mortgage Electronic Registration Sytems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Tae-Ryoung Park
Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. v. PMC Bancorp
as 2:2010cv07207
Plaintiff:
Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
PMC Bancorp
David Gomez v. Reconstruct Company, N.A. et al
as 2:2010cv04317
Defendant:
Bac Home Loans Servicing, LP, DOES, PMC Bancorp and others
Plaintiff:
David Gomez
Mayela Gutierrez et al v. Indymac FSB et al
as 2:2010cv00891
Defendant:
Does, Indymac FSB and PMC Bancorp
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Gutierrez and Mayela Gutierrez
Respondent:
Quality Loan Service Corporation
Viviana Eslava et al v. Citimortgage et al
as 2:2009cv07458
Plaintiff:
Viviana Eslava, Viviana Eslava, Viviana Eslava and others
Defendant:
Constantino Molina, Constantino Molina, Constantino Molina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Injunctive/Declaratory Relief
Naomi Yeon Hee Chun v. PMC Bancorp et al
as 2:2009cv07184
Plaintiff:
Naomi Yeon Hee Chun
Defendant:
PMC Bancorp and Does
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Eun Hee Rhee v. PMC Bancorp et al
as 2:2009cv06385
Plaintiff:
Eun Hee Rhee
Defendant:
PMC Bancorp, Aurora Loan Services, Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
