Cases 21 - 30 of 377
Ameris Bank v. Webb Family Medical Clinic, PLLC et al
as 8:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia corporation dba Balboa Capital Corporation and Ameris Bank a Georgia corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Webb Family Medical Clinic, PLLC, a professional limited liability company, Edward Larwood Nerren III, Kimberly Leigh Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank et al v. Arlington Preventive Care Medical Clinic, P.A., et al
as 8:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia corporation dba Balboa Capital Corporation and Ameris Bank a Georgia corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Arlington Preventative Care Medical Clinic, P.A., a Texas professional association, Jeanine Thomas, Arlington Preventive Care Medical Clinic, P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. Troky Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation and Ameris Bank a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Troky Inc. and George Petrov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. R and R Lucky, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00878
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital and Ameris Bank a Georgia state chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital
Defendant:
R&R Lucky, Inc., Javneet Sandhu and R and R Lucky, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. STL Grading LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00588
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital and Ameris Bank a Georgia state chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital
Defendant:
STL Grading, LLC, Michael Wayne Gibson and STL Grading LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. Heavenly Scent Commercial Cleaning Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00577
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital and Ameris Bank a Georgia state chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital
Defendant:
Heavenly Scent Commercial Cleaning, Inc., Howard Derek Niven and Heavenly Scent Commercial Cleaning Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation v. United Real Estate Resources LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00981
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
United Real Estate Resources LLC and Dee Sims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation v. Cloudsmartz, LLC
as 8:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Cloudsmartz, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. Peter F. DiPaolo et al
as 8:2024cv00934
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation and Ameris Bank a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
MD, PA Peter F. DiPaolo and Peter F. DiPaolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ameris Bank v. Southern Coker Power L.L.C. et al
as 8:2024cv00921
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank, a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation and Ameris Bank a Georgia state-chartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
Southern Coker Power L.L.C. and Ethridge Cody Coker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
