Cases filed in the US District Court for the Central District of California
Cases 21 - 30 of 32
James Rasmussen et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv09350
Defendant: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc, Anchor Darling Valve Company and others
Plaintiff: James Rasmussen and Treva Rasmussen
James Rasmussen et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv09342
Defendant: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc, Anchor Darling Valve Company and others
Plaintiff: James Rasmussen and Treva Rasmussen
Charles Tyrone Hill et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv08713
Defendant: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc., Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Charles Tyrone Hill and Susan Hill
Robert Koller et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv06000
Defendant: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Aurora Pump Company, CBS Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Robert Koller and Velma Koller
Dehlbom et al v. ABB Inc, et al
as 2:2012cv05167
Defendant: ABB Inc, Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Alaska Tanker Company LLC and others
Plaintiff: Mary C Cline, David L Dehlbom, Kathryn J Dehlbom and others
Julio Gomez Jr. et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02302
Defendant: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Aurora Pump Company, BW IP Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Julio Gomez, Jr. and Sharon Gomez
Lee E. Knowles v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02284
Defendant: A.W. Chesterton Company, Alfa Laval, Inc., Amtrol, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Joyce Knowles and Lee E. Knowles
Swain et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02168
Defendant: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc, Amcord Inc and others
Plaintiff: Daniel Swain and Kathy Swain
Marion Cherry et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv01745
Defendant: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc., Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Charlotte Cherry and Marion Cherry
The: Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company
Rosalie Jean Nelson v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00811
Ued As Successor-by-merger To Buffalo Pumps, Inc: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To The Delaval Separator Company: Alfa Laval Inc
Ued As Successor-in-interest To Thursh Company And H.A. Thrush Company: Amtrol Inc
Defendant: Armstrong International Inc, CLA-VAL Co, Cameron International Corporation and others
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Chapman Valve Company, Deming Pump Company, Jenkin: Crane Co
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Mundet Cork Company: Crown Cork and Seal Company Inc
Ued As Successor To Sierra Talc Company And United Talc Company: Cyprus Amax Minerals Company
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Northern Pump Company Fka Northern Fire Apparatu: FMC Corporation
Ued As Successor To Edward Valve, Inc: Flowserve US Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Henry Valve Co: Henry Technologies Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Delaval Turbine, Inc., And C.H. Wheeler Manufactur: IMO Industries
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Robertshaw Controls Company Dba Fulton Sylphon Val: Invensys Systems Inc
Plaintiff: Rosalie Jean Nelson
Ued Successor-in-interest To Klipfel Valves, Inc: O C Keckley Company
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To International Talc Company: RT Vanderbilt Company Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Zurn Industries, Inc: Zurn Industries LLC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?