Cases 41 - 50 of 132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01829
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
The Bank of New York Mellon v. Tom D. Soumas Jr et al
as 2:2016cv06271
Defendant:
Frederick Barak, Does, McColgan and Vanni and others
Plaintiff:
The Bank of New York Mellon
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01768
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States of America v. Jed K Rizk et al
as 2:2016cv05833
Defendant:
California Franchise Tax Board, Diana Carol Rizk, Jed K Rizk and others
213) 894-0115 (fax:
United States of America
United States of America v. Michael Campbell et al
as 8:2016cv01407
Defendant:
CIT Bank, N.A., Michael Campbell, Terry Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05635
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Padma Vanjani v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2016cv04805
Claimant:
CA Franchise Tax Board
Defendant:
Does, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and U.S. Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Padma Vanjani
Supervalu, Inc. v. Guillermo Daniel Camuy et al
as 2:2016cv02768
Defendant:
American Contractors Indemnity Company, California Franchise Tax Board, Guillermo Daniel Camuy and others
Plaintiff:
Supervalu, Inc.
O Hagins, Inc. et al v. UBS AG et al
as 8:2016cv00716
Defendant:
California Franchise Tax Board, Does, William A Goddard and others
Plaintiff:
Carolina Stollenwerk O Hagin and O Hagins, Inc.
Fab Films, LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 2:2016cv01722
Cross Defendant:
Blue Horse Trading, LLC, Citi Communications Finance Corporation, Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP and others
Defendant:
California Reconveyance Company, Does and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Fab Films, LLC
Cross Claimant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
