Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Jorge David Wong et al
as 2:2019cv02087
Defendant:
Mancora Peruvian Cuisine, Inc., Jorge David Wong, Jorge David Wong doing business as Mancora Peruvian Cuisine and others
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. and Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Cross Defendant:
DIRECTV Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jon Wulf Amadeus Adler v. Directv, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01665
Plaintiff:
Jon Wulf Amadeus Adler
Defendant:
Directv Digital LLC, Directv Enterprises LLC, Directv Group Holdings LLC and others
Ivan Mejia v. DirecTV, Inc et al
as 5:2017cv01420
Defendant:
DirecTV, Inc., Does and Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ivan Mejia
Robert Gary Lippincott, Jr. v. DIRECTV, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv09996
Defendant:
DIRECTV Inc and Directv Holdings LLC
Plaintiff:
Robert Gary Lippincott, Jr.
David P. Gomez et al v. Top Rank, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06227
Defendant:
AT&T Inc, Comcast Corportion, DIRECTV Inc and others
Plaintiff:
David P Gomez, Peter Gomez, Robert Martinez and others
Pierre Cooper et al v. DirecTV, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08097
Plaintiff:
Pierre Cooper, Rene Gonzalez, David Kondetti and others
Defendant:
DirecTV, Inc. and Directv, LLC
George Martin v. DirecTV, Inc. et al.
as 2:2014cv06864
Defendant:
DirecTV, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
George Martin
Luke Sais v. DIRECTV Inc et al
as 2:2013cv09429
Defendant:
DIRECTV Inc, DIRECTV LLC and DTV Home Services II LLC
Plaintiff:
Luke Sais
Robert Mullings et al v. DIRECTV Inc et al
as 2:2013cv08167
Defendant:
DIRECTV Inc, DIRECTV LLC, DTV Home Services II LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kerwyn Kirton, Daniel Majeski and Robert Mullings
Marlon Hall et al v. DIRECTV Inc et al
as 2:2013cv08158
Plaintiff:
John Albrecht, Marlon Hall, Alix Pierre and others
Defendant:
DIRECTV Inc, DIRECTV LLC, DTV Home Services II LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
