Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Dero Maples v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2016cv03576
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, 3M Company, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dero Maples, Jr
Billy Richard Folston et al v. Alfa Laval, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv06313
Plaintiff:
Billy Richard Folston, Billy Richard Folston, Billy Richard Folston and others
Defendant:
Alfa Laval, Inc., Allis Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust, Anderson Greenwood & Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Type:
Other Statutes
Lilia Nepomuceno et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 2:2009cv06092
Plaintiff:
Lilia Nepomuceno, Lilia Nepomuceno, Lilia Nepomuceno and others
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Alfa Laval, Inc., Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Billy Richard Folston et al v. Alfa Laval, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv05792
Plaintiff:
Billy Richard Folston, Billy Richard Folston, Billy Richard Folston and others
Defendant:
Alfa Laval, Inc., Allis Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust, Anderson, Greenwood & Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Ellis Michael Staton et al v. American Standard, Inc.
as 2:2009cv03724
Plaintiff:
Ellis Michael Staton, Ellis Michael Staton, Ellis Michael Staton and others
Defendant:
American Standard, Inc., Aurora Pump Company, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Betty Vaught et al v. AGCO Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv07330
Defendant:
AGCO Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc., Allis Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Jones, A. J. V., Aaron P. Vaught and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
