Cases 1 - 10 of 499
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01219
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Zheng Lyu v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Servcie, et al
as 2:2018cv05468
Defendant:
Kathy Baran, Nicholas Colucci, Jeh Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Zheng Lyu
Glen Brayshaw v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Service et al
as 2:2018cv02489
Defendant:
Kathy Baran, Nicholas Colucci, Jeh Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Glen Brayshaw
Ran Tao et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2018cv01140
Defendant:
Kathy Baran, Nicholas Colucci, Jeh Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Yangfang Ge, Qiuqin Gu, Li Tan and others
Jing Yuan et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Service et al
as 2:2018cv00317
Defendant:
Kathy Baran, Nicholas Colucci, Jeh Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Jieying Feng, Tianmiao Yang and Jing Yuan
Chenggui Hua et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Service et al
as 2:2017cv04101
Defendant:
Kathy Baran, Nicholas Colucci, Jeh Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Chenggui Hua, Jianhua Sun, Lixin Yan and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Yiwei Chen et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Service et al
as 2:2017cv06874
Defendant:
Kathy Baran, Nicholas Colucci, Jeh Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Yiwei Chen, Song Hao, Yiling Ho and others
Xiujuan Gao v. Jeh Johnson et al
as 2:2017cv05092
Plaintiff:
Xiujuan Gao
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson and James McCament
Su Sin Coong v. Jefferson B. Sessions et al
as 5:2017cv00962
Petitioner:
Su Sin Coong
Respondent:
James Janecka, David Jenning, Jeh Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03018
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
