Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Randi M Mazzara v. Union Pacific Railroad et al
as 8:2024cv01081
Plaintiff:
Randi M. Mazzara
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad, Blet Union 660, National Mediation Board and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
David Hough et al v. Ryan Carroll et al
as 2:2024cv02886
Plaintiff:
David Hough, Mouloud Hocine, Jennifer Lehmkuhl Hill and others
Defendant:
Ryan Carroll, Max K. Day, Max O. Day and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Tal Avitan et al v. Kimberly Kirchmeyer et al
as 2:2022cv08589
Petitioner:
Tal Avitan and Lauren Sara Samipur
Respondent:
Secretary Kimberly Kirchmeyer, CA Department of Consumer Affairs, The CA Contractors State License Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Debra Joann Coates Griffin v. Mediator Law Group, PC
as 2:2022cv02023
Plaintiff:
Debra Joann Coates Griffin
Defendant:
Mediator Law Group, PC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv08056
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01317
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv09076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv06405
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
