Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Bruce Belodoff v. Netlist Inc et al
as 8:2007cv00677
Plaintiff:
Bruce Belodoff
Defendant:
Chun K Hong, Lee Kim and Netlist Inc
Consol Defendant:
Nam Ki Hong, Thomas F Lagatta, Needham and Company LLC and others
Movant:
Iron Workers Local No. 25 Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Benjamin v. Netlist, Inc et al
as 8:2007cv01368
Plaintiff:
Ragaa Benjamin, Ragaa Benjamin and Ragaa Benjamin
Defendant:
Netlist, Inc, Chun K Hong, Christopher Lopes and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
James H Swofford v. Netlist Inc et al
as 2:2007cv04006
Plaintiff:
James H Swofford, James H Swofford, James H Swofford and others
Defendant:
Netlist Inc, Chun K Hong, Christopher Lopes and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Austin Nopper v. US Auto Parts Network Inc et al
as 2:2007cv02775
Plaintiff:
Austin Nopper and Austin Nopper
Defendant:
US Auto Parts Network Inc, Sol Khazani, Mehran Nia and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Johnson v. US Auto Parts Network Inc et al
as 2:2007cv02030
Plaintiff:
Patricia Johnson, Patricia Johnson, Patricia Johnson and others
Defendant:
US Auto Parts Network Inc, US Auto Parts Network Inc, US Auto Parts Network Inc and others
Movant:
Darien Behravan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Jim Brown v. Brett C Brewer et al
as 2:2006cv03731
Plaintiff:
Jim Brown and Brad Greenspan
Petitioner:
James A Nelson, John Friedmann and Patty Pierce
Defendant:
Brett C Brewer, Daniel L Mosher, Lawrence Moreau and others
Consolidated Defendant:
VP Alpha Holdings IV LLC,, Vantagepoint Venture Partners IV LP and Vantagepoint Venture Partners IV Principals Fund LP
Claimant:
Stubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP
Not Classified By Court:
Trafelet & Company, LLC and Richard A Bordow
3Rd Party Defendant:
VantagePoint Venture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
