Cases 121 - 130 of 177
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Riley et al
as 2:2012cv00761
Defendant:
Glenn Michael Kuder, Philip J. Riley, Richard Burill and others
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vang v. Fernandez et al
as 2:2012cv00503
Plaintiff:
Chanthavong Vang
Defendant:
Eric G. Fernandez, Sean H. Bedrosian, TFLG A Law Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Latuhoi v. Bank of America N.A et al
as 2:2012cv00370
Plaintiff:
Sione V. Latuhoi
Defendant:
Bank of America N.A, Bank of New York Mellon, McCarthy & Holthus, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Archer et al v. J E BURKE CONSTRUCTION INC et al
as 1:2012at00045
Plaintiff:
Darrell Archer and Keitha Darquea
Defendant:
J E BURKE CONSTRUCTION INC , JOSEPH BURKE and JILL GIPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Archer et al v. JE Burke Construction Inc et al
as 1:2012cv00128
Plaintiff:
Darrell Archer and Keitha Darquea
Defendant:
JE Burke Construction Inc , Joseph Burke and Jill Gipson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatcher et al v. City of Porterville et al
as 1:2011cv02015
Plaintiff:
Buddy Hatcher and Holley Hatcher
Defendant:
City of Porterville, County of Tulare, RailAmerica, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Quinn v. Levan, Jr.
as 2:2011at01697
Plaintiff:
Randy Quinn
Defendant:
Elwood Levan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Quinn v. Levan, Jr.
as 2:2011cv03106
Plaintiff:
Randy Quinn
Defendant:
Elwood Levan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bock et al v. Smith et al
as 2:2011cv02903
Defendant:
Devin Smith , Roland Smith , Bruce Speckert and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory W. Bock , Cal-Med Wellness Centers, Inc. , Aaron D. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stanford v. Hughes
as 2:2011at01574
Plaintiff:
Billy L Stanford
Defendant:
Curtis J Hughes and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
