Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Ramon Quesada v. Marten Transport, Ltd et al
as 2:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Ramon Quesada
Defendant:
Marten Transport, LTD., Marten Transport, Marten Transport Services, LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Saint-Fleur v. Wilkie
as 1:2021at00031
Defendant:
Robert L. Wilkie
Plaintiff:
Pierre E. Saint-Fleur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Mizar, et al., v. H&E Equipment Services
as 2:2020cv02419
Plaintiff:
Bryan Ashley and Steve Mizar
Defendant:
H&E Equipment Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perez v. Scanlon et al
as 2:2020at00982
Defendant:
William E Scanlon and SIERRA MOUNTAIN EXPRESS, INC.
Plaintiff:
Sigifredo Perez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Perez v. Sierra Mountain Express, Inc., et al
as 2:2020cv02003
Plaintiff:
Sigifredo Perez, Jr.
Defendant:
Sierra Mountain Express, Inc. and William E. Scanlon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Saint-Fleur v. Barretto et al
as 1:2018at00801
Defendant:
Herman Barretto, Mary Jordan-Church and Robert Wilkie
Plaintiff:
Pierre E. Saint-Fleur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Saint-Fleur v. Barretto et al
as 1:2018cv01517
Defendant:
Herman Barretto, Mary Jordan-Church and Robert Wilkie
Plaintiff:
Pierre E. Saint-Fleur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Martinez v. E&A Protective Services-Bravo LLC
as 1:2018at00352
Defendant:
E&A Protective Services-Bravo LLC
Plaintiff:
Richard Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martinez v. E&A Protective Services-Bravo, LLC
as 1:2018cv00658
Defendant:
E&A Protective Services-Bravo, LLC
Plaintiff:
Richard Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith-Emery Company, et al v. State of California, et al
as 2:2017cv00435
Plaintiff:
Smith-Emery Company and James E. Patridge
Defendant:
State of California, Division of State Architect and State of California, Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
