Cases 61 - 70 of 79
Cornog v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2007cv00544
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Cornog
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Overholtzer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2007cv00553
Plaintiff:
Lori Overholtzer
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2007at00153
Plaintiff:
Carl Smith
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cruse v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2007cv00455
Plaintiff:
Edward Cruse
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fouissi v. Astrue
as 1:2007cv00445
Plaintiff:
Brenda Gale Fouissi
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Maiso Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2007cv00416
Plaintiff:
Maiso Lee
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Keokham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2007cv00426
Plaintiff:
Phouk Keokham
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Ann Carolyn Long v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2007cv00346
Plaintiff:
Ann Carolyn Long
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, Michael J. Astrue and U.S. Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lydia English v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2007cv00314
Plaintiff:
Lydia English
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Vincent Fernandez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2007cv00313
Plaintiff:
Vincent Fernandez
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
