Cases 121 - 130 of 3,893
AALFS Family Partnership et al v. GSL Holdings, S.A. de C.V. et al
as 2:2023at00412
Plaintiff:
AALFS Family Partnership and William E. Rodawig Family Trust
Defendant:
GSL Holdings, S.A. de C.V., CMT De la Laguna, S.A. de C.V., Capacidade de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. and others
(PS) Qi v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2023cv00377
Plaintiff:
Aiai Qi
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Emilia Bardini
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Morales, et al., v. Sunpath Ltd., et al.,
as 2:2023mc00111
Plaintiff:
Kurt Morales II, Brandon Callier and Lucas Horton
Defendant:
Sunpath Ltd.
Respondent:
National Car Cure LLC
LaComba et al v Eagle Home Loans and Investment LLC, et al
as 2:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee LaComba, Sr. and Rochelle Louise LaComba
Defendant:
Eagle Home Loans and Investment, LLC and Del Toro Loan Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
The McClatchy Co., LLC v. Kelly et al
as 2:2022mc00364
Plaintiff:
The McClatchy Company, LLC
Defendant:
Robert Kelly, Eryn Learned and Kerry Wano
v. State of California, ex rel. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California et al
as 2:2023at00369
Defendant:
State of California, ex rel. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California, Azuma Corporation, Darren Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
State of California, ex rel. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California v. Azuma Corporation et al
as 2:2023at00370
Plaintiff:
State of California, ex rel. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California
Defendant:
Azuma Corporation, Phillip Del Rosa, Wendy Del Rosa and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Consumer 2.0, Inc. v. Fu, et al.
as 1:2023mc00031
Plaintiff:
Consumer 2.0, Inc.
Defendant:
Tonny Fu, Tonny Vu and John Doe
Heinz v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
Brian Heinz
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
