Cases 61 - 70 of 3,893
B&G Foods North America Inc. v. Embry et al
as 2:2024mc00011
Plaintiff:
B&G Foods North America, Inc.
Defendant:
Kim Embry and Environmental Health Advocates, Inc.
Petitioner:
Shaun Markley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ferrari Financial Services, Inc. v. Zcrete Systems Int'l, Inc. et al
as 2:2024mc00007
Plaintiff:
Ferrari Financial Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Zcrete Systems International, Inc. and Brian Wayne Brogie
B&G Foods North America Inc. v. Embry et al
as 2:2024mc00003
Plaintiff:
B&G Foods North America, Inc.
Defendant:
Kim Embry and Environmental Health Advocates, Inc.
Petitioner:
Jake Schulte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rose v. Cellular Touch Wireless Inc.
as 2:2023mc00434
Plaintiff:
William Rose
Defendant:
Cellular Touch Wireless Inc.
Not Yet Classified:
Mandiant Inc.
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company
as 2:2023cv03030
Plaintiff:
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
Defendant:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Not Classified By Court:
Environmental Defense Fund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
CA Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Pacific Bell Telephone Co.
as 2:2024mc00004
Plaintiff:
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
Defendant:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Not Yet Classified:
Environmental Defense Fund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
United States of America v. Newbold
as 2:2023at01308
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Brent Lee Newbold
People of the State of California v. Ejuicesteals.com et al
as 1:2023cv01726
Plaintiff:
People of the State of California
Defendant:
Ejuicesteals.com and Remon Hanna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
People of the State of California v. EJUICESTEALS.COM et al
as 1:2023at01038
Plaintiff:
People of the State of California
Defendant:
EJUICESTEALS.COM and Remon Hanna
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
