Cases 1 - 8 of 8
(PS) The People of the State of California v. Gonshorowski
as 2:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
Analeah Moriah Gonshorowski
Defendant:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
(PS) Boiteau v. The People of the State of CA
as 2:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Richard Marc Boiteau
Defendant:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
People of The State of California v. Tamplen
as 2:2010at00078
Plaintiff:
People of The State of California
Defendant:
Sherman Clay Tamplen
Movant:
United States of America and Marco Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
People of The State of California v. Tamplen
as 2:2010mc00006
Plaintiff:
People of The State of California
Defendant:
Sherman Clay Tamplen
Movant:
United States of America and Marco Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
People of the State of California
as 2:2009at00021
Plaintiff:
People of the State of California and People of the State of California
Defendant:
Wayne A. Stroman and Stroman Realty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Injunctive/Declaratory Relief
People of the State of California v. Stroman
as 2:2009at00020
Defendant:
Wayne A. Stroman
Plaintiff:
People of the State of California and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Injunctive/Declaratory Relief
People of The State of California v. Stroman
as 2:2009at00019
Defendant:
Wayne A. Stroman
Plaintiff:
People of The State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Injunctive/Declaratory Relief
People of the State of California
as 2:2009cv00031
Plaintiff:
People of the State of California
Defendant:
Wayne A. Stroman and Stroman Realty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
