Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter v. Directv, LLC
as 2:2018cv00686
Defendant:
DirecTV, LLC
Plaintiff:
Carlo Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roy et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2018at00208
Plaintiff:
Brandy M. Carter Roy and Susan Martin
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Jason Arroyo and DOES 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Roy et al v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. et al
as 2:2018cv00398
Plaintiff:
Brandy M. Carter Roy and Susan Martin
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank N.A. and Jason Arroyo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roy et al v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. et al
as 2:2018at00209
Plaintiff:
Brandy M. Carter Roy and Susan Martin
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank N.A. , Jason Arroyo and Does 1 - 100 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
California Pawnbrokers Association, Inc. v. United States Department of Defense et al
as 2:2016at01119
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense and Ashton B. Carter
Plaintiff:
California Pawnbrokers Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
California Pawnbrokers Association, Inc. v. Carter et al
as 2:2016cv02141
Defendant:
Ashton B. Carter and United States Department of Defense
Plaintiff:
California Pawnbrokers Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Carter v. Credence Resource Management, LLC
as 2:2016cv02112
Plaintiff:
Dimitri Carter
Defendant:
Credence Resource Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Carter v. Credence Resource Management, LLC et al
as 2:2016at01104
Plaintiff:
Dimitri Carter
Defendant:
Credence Resource Management, LLC and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cunningham v. Seymour, et al.
as 2:2014mc00063
Plaintiff:
Rick Cunningham
Defendant:
Lamar Seymour , Lanelle Seymour , Noel Fisher and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
