Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ruiz De Martinez v. Aramark Services, Inc., et al.
as 1:2024cv00625
Plaintiff:
Maria Ruiz De Martinez
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc. and Degnan's Kitchen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
v. RUIZ DE MARTINEZ et al
as 1:2024at00420
Defendant:
Maria RUIZ DE MARTINEZ and ARAMARK SERVICES INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ruiz v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Annette S. Ruiz
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Covidien, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
ARANA et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2022at00764
Plaintiff:
ANGELICA ARANA and JOSE ARANA
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Indian Health Service, BAKERSFIELD AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH PROJECT and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Arana et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2022cv01264
Plaintiff:
Angelica Arana and Jose Arana
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Indian Health Service, Bakersfield American Indian Health Project and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Ruiz v. United States Postal Service, et al.
as 1:2020cv01800
Plaintiff:
Ivonne Ruiz
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Eric William Christiansen
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
R.R., et al. v. County of Tulare, et al.
as 1:2016cv00570
Plaintiff:
R. R. and Debra Ruiz
Defendant:
County of Tulare , City of Farmersville and City of Visalia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez et al v. Heritage Operating L.P., et al.,
as 2:2013cv01718
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Gonzalez , Guadalupe Arias and Roberto Ruiz
Defendant:
Heritage Operating L.P., Heritage Holdings, Inc., Heritage Service Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
